<rss
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    version="2.0"><channel>
<title>
 
<![CDATA[Tag: golang | JaredForsyth.com]]>
 
</title>
<item>
<title>
 
<![CDATA[Rust vs Go]]>
 
</title>
<description>
 
<![CDATA[<p>Go and Rust seem like natural competitors. They are both trying the role of a C-like low-level language with modern affordances, safety, and nice, clean concurrency. And they’re each backed by a major player in the browser race - go by Google, rust by Mozilla.</p>
 6 minute read]]>
 
</description>
<summary>
 
<![CDATA[<p>Go and Rust seem like natural competitors. They are both trying the role of a C-like low-level language with modern affordances, safety, and nice, clean concurrency. And they’re each backed by a major player in the browser race - go by Google, rust by Mozilla.</p>
 6 minute read]]>
 
</summary>
<author> "Jared Forsyth" </author>
<link>
 
https://jaredforsyth.com/posts/rust-vs-go/
 
</link>
<guid>
 
https://jaredforsyth.com/posts/rust-vs-go/
 
</guid>

<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>